A slander designed to dehumanize, spread hatred, and pave the way for extermination. The proof of its coordination with the October 7 massacre lies in the dates.
📅 October 7, 2023
Hamas enters Israel. It massacres civilians, burns homes, kidnaps children. It is the day of the attack. But it is also the day the counter-narrative begins. On social media, online, in universities, the word “genocide” is already circulating. And not to describe Hamas’s attack—but to accuse Israel.
📅 October 9 – London
First protest in front of the Israeli Embassy. There is still no ground operation, only a horrific and bestial slaughter in Israel—the worst since the Shoah. But the protest is already against the “genocide.” Signs, chants, graphics: the frame is activated. Israel, just attacked, is already guilty.
📅 October 13 – Chicago
The pro-Palestinian rally accuses Israel of ethnic cleansing. No troops are in Gaza yet, but the language of war crimes is fully operational. The children, women, and aid workers who have been massacred are in Israel—their bodies still to be gathered and buried—but Israel is already branded a genocidal entity. This is not madness—it’s a strategy.
📅 October 14 – Geneva
Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur, speaks of “mass ethnic cleansing.” It marks a shift of state: from the streets to diplomacy, from propaganda to legitimation.
📅 October 14 – London
Over 150,000 people march. One protester declares: “I’m here to protest the genocide.” The term is central, recurrent, shared. Israel has not yet entered Gaza, paralyzed by the massacre it just endured and the looming threat of a northern attack. Hamas leaders are emboldened, clearly expressing their goal of extermination.
This is the moment when the streets ignite in unison, and in propaganda, the accusation of genocide is hurled at Israel with increasing obsessiveness. Israel is the target whose very existence must first be delegitimized—and then physically and bloodily eliminated.
The truth is this: the accusation of genocide did not arise in response to Israeli military action. It emerged in parallel with the Hamas attack and accompanied it from the very first minute. The demonstrations in the immediate aftermath of October 7 unfolded within a media and ideological cloud where “genocide” was already the catchword. The flags are the same, the signs pre-printed, social media channels reactivated in advance. The attack is synchronous, not reactive. It is a global campaign that uses the fabrication of a genocide to justify a real project: the eradication of the Jewish state.
All of this has a name: exterminationist antisemitism.
It is the invention of a genocide, organized and coordinated to enable a real one.
And there is nothing humanitarian in plans of extermination.
— The Free4Future Editorial Team
Add comment